On December 28, Imad Wasim confirmed the divorce through a brief social media statement, saying the decision was made due to mutual differences.

He also asked the public to respect the privacy of both families. The message was calm and measured, but it did little to slow the growing storm online.

Soon after, Sania Ashfaq shared a response that many users saw as a carefully worded hint toward the involvement of a third person in the breakdown of the marriage. Although she did not name anyone directly, the tone of her message was enough to spark widespread speculation.

Attention quickly shifted to Naila Raja, a digital creator and lawyer whose name had previously been linked with Imad Wasim.

The speculation gained traction because in July 2025, photos and videos of Imad and Naila together had gone viral at a time when Sania Ashfaq was reportedly expecting a child.

Following the divorce announcement, Naila Raja faced intense public scrutiny. Many social media users demanded a clear denial or proof to counter the allegations, while others openly blamed her for the failed marriage.

Breaking her silence, Naila Raja released a detailed statement that leaned heavily on legal reasoning.

She said that anyone claiming to have real evidence should present it before the proper legal authorities rather than turning social media into a courtroom. She added that defamation applies only to false and harmful claims, and that the truth does not fear legal scrutiny.

Her response divided public opinion. Some users labeled her remarks as cold and calculated, accusing her of hiding behind legal language.

Others felt her confident tone suggested that she considers herself innocent and unwilling to participate in what they called a social media trial.

One user commented, ‘This kind of confidence only comes when a person feels untouchable.” Another pointed out that “Sania never took a name, yet the defensive reaction raises more questions than answers.’

At the same time, a smaller but vocal group argued that Naila Raja’s stance reflects a preference for lawful resolution over online judgment, a move they see as mature in an emotionally charged situation.

So far, Imad Wasim has not issued any further statement, leaving the public to connect the dots on its own. As the story continues to unfold, the line between private life and public debate grows thinner, keeping the controversy firmly in the spotlight.